Resumo Introdução Entender os efeitos da terapia periodontal é fator essencial no desempenho e satisfação de pacientes parcialmente dentados. Objetivo Avaliar o efeito do tratamento periodontal subgengival na performance ao mastigar e na satisfação e capacidade mastigatória auto-reportadas em pacientes parcialmente dentados. Material e método Pacientes parcialmente dentados com periodontite crônica não tratada (n=11) receberam tratamento periodontal não-cirúrgico e tiveram a sua satisfação, capacidade e performance mastigatória aferidas antes e após o tratamento. A performance mastigatória foi aferida objetivamente pelo método da peneiragem de um alimento simulado após mastigação seguida da medição do tamanho das partículas. Resultado A satisfação e a capacidade mastigatória foram mensuradas a partir de um questionário com base no OHIP-EDENT. O número médio de unidades funcionais anteriores foi de 10,36 ± 1,43 e posteriores de 6,73 ± 0,79, sem alterações após o tratamento. A performance mastigatória não apresentou diferença (p = 0,075) (tamanhos de partícula 4,23 ± 1,84 mm e 3,90 ± 0,75 mm antes e após o tratamento periodontal, respectivamente). A satisfação e a capacidade mastigatória apresentaram valores após o tratamento periodontal superiores (p > 0,05) em comparação aos valores prévios aos tratamentos. Conclusão O tratamento periodontal, considerando a manutenção dos pares funcionais do início do tratamento, promove uma melhoria na satisfação e capacidade mastigatória auto-reportadas, sem afetar a performance mastigatória.

Abstract Introduction Understanding the effects of periodontal therapy is essential in performance and satisfaction of partially dentate patients. Objective To assess the effect of subgingival periodontal treatment in performance and masticatory satisfaction and ability as reported by partially dentate patients with untreated chronic periodontitis. Materials and method Patients were given nonsurgical periodontal treatment and masticatory satisfaction, ability, and performance were evaluated before and after treatment. Performance was assessed based on sieving chewed standardized chewable material, while satisfaction and ability were analyzed using a questionnaire based on OHIP-EDENT. Result Mean numbers of functional tooth units were 10.36 ± 1.43 anterior and 6.73 ± 0.79 posterior teeth. Masticatory performance did not vary significantly (p = 0.075), and mean particle sizes before and after treatment were 4.23 ± 1.84 mm and 3.90 ± 0.75 mm, respectively. Overall satisfaction and ability scores after treatment were higher (p > 0.05) compared with scores prior to the periodontal intervention. Conclusion Periodontal treatment improves masticatory satisfaction and ability with no effect on performance.

Panoramic radiographs are important for the evaluation and classification of the third molars position, allowing the diagnosis and planning of extraction. The objective of this study is to evaluate upper and lower third molars positions in panoramic radiographs with the classification methods proposed by Pell and Gregory (1933) and Winter (1926) and the subsequent comparison of results with other authors. Panoramic radiographs of 310 patients were analyzed, 197 female and 113 male, totaling 1,211 third molars. In relation to the upper third molars, the most prevalent positions were: angle compared to the long axis of the second molar of Distoangular form (53.23 %) and the depth of impaction as Class C (48.25 %). In the lower third molars, the most prevalent positions were: angle to the long axis of the second molar in Mesioangular classification (52.96 %), the depth of impaction was B (46.54 %) and the tooth relationship with the mandibular ramus was identified as class I (55.26 %). These results provide information that can be utilized in predicting third molar development in terms of impaction or eruption, assisting dental surgeons in making decisions regarding surgical planning and treatment.

Las radiografías panorámicas son importantes para la evaluación y clasificación de la posición de los terceros molares, lo que permite el diagnóstico y la planificación de la extracción. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar terceros molares superiores e inferiores y posiciones en las radiografías panorámicas con los métodos de clasificación propuestas por Pell & Gregory, y Winter y la posterior comparación de los resultados con otros autores. Se analizaron las radiografías panorámicas de 310 pacientes, 197 mujeres y 113 hombres, con un total de 1.211 terceros molares. En relación con los terceros molares superiores, las posiciones más prevalentes fueron: ángulo con respecto al eje longitudinal del segundo molar de forma distoangular (53,23 %) y la profundidad de la impactación como Clase C (48,25 %). En los terceros molares inferiores, las posiciones más prevalentes fueron: ángulo con respecto al eje longitudinal del segundo molar en la clasificación mesioangular (52,96 %), la profundidad de impactación fue de B (46,54 %) y la relación de los dientes con la rama mandibular fue identificado como Clase I (55,26 %). Estos resultados proporcionan información que puede ser utilizada para predecir el desarrollo del tercer molar en términos de compactación o erupción, ayudando a los cirujanos dentistas en la toma de decisiones respecto a la planificación y el tratamiento quirúrgico.

Due to the complexity of the treatment of condylar hyperplasia associated with dentofacial deformities and its complications, if left untreated, the surgeon should be alert to these factors at the time of surgical planning to tailor the optimal therapy for an individual patient. This case report describes a patient with right condylar hyperplasia associated with dentofacial deformity who was treated surgically with low condylectomy, articular disc repositioning and anchoring, and orthognathic surgery, concomitantly, with stable results, satisfactory occlusion and facial harmony.

Debido a la complejidad del tratamiento de la hiperplasia condilar asociada con deformidades dentofaciales y sus complicaciones, si no se trata, el cirujano debe estar alerta ante estos factores en el momento de la planificación quirúrgica para adaptar la terapia óptima para cada paciente. Este caso describe un paciente con hiperplasia condilar derecha asociada con la deformidad dentofacial que fue tratado quirúrgicamente con condilectomía baja, reposicionamiento y anclaje del disco articular, y la cirugía ortognática, concomitantemente, con resultados estables, oclusión satisfactoria y armonía facial.

The present article aimed to present a standardized protocol for the production of a chewable test material that has been used in masticatory efficiency and performance studies. This chewable material has advantages in respect to its physical properties when compared to other artificial and natural test foods. It is constituted by mixing condensation silicon (58.3% by weight), common plaster (10.2% by weight), alginate (12.5% by weight), solid vaseline (11.5% by weight), tooth paste (7.5% by weight), and catalyst paste (20.8 mg/g), adding also three drops of mint essence. The mixed material is then inserted into an acrylic mould with perforations of 12 mm in diameter and 5 mm in height to produce rounded tablets with those measures after polymerization. It was named "Optocal - Brazilian version". A volume of 3 cm³ is indicated for a chewing test, which corresponds to 12 tablets using the present methodology. The present protocol can make the production of this chewable material easier, helping in its standardization for studies on masticatory function.

A maioria dos usuários de PPR mostra-se satisfeita com suas próteses, porém os fatores que influenciam a satisfação e aceitação não estão determinados. OBJETIVO: Este estudo explorou variáveis técnicas, biológicas e de satisfação no funcionamento de próteses parciais removíveis (PPRs) após cinco anos de uso, comparando a avaliação do paciente e do cirurgião-dentista. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Cinqüenta adultos (39 mulheres, 11 homens) foram reexaminados após cinco anos da instalação de PPR. Através de exame clínico e questionário estruturado, foram coletados os dados relativos às condições dos tecidos de suporte, aceitação e características técnicas da PPR, mastigação, estética, conforto, higiene e necessidade de intervenção profissional. Os dados foram analisados por estatística descritiva e por correlação de Spearman. RESULTADOS: Mais de 50% dos pacientes classificaram suas próteses como excelente quanto à retenção, mastigação, estética, conforto e higiene. Na avaliação do profissional, retenção e estabilidade foram consideradas excelentes em mais de 66% dos pacientes, e a higiene dos dentes e da prótese foi considerada boa em 52% e 46% dos casos, respectivamente. As armações metálicas e bases acrílicas foram consideradas adaptadas em 92% dos casos. Aceitação da prótese foi associada com retenção, mastigação, estética, higiene e conforto avaliados pelo paciente, e com retenção, estabilidade e condição da armação metálica avaliadas pelo profissional. Retenção e mastigação/conforto, avaliados pelo paciente, mostraram correlação positiva moderada com retenção e estabilidade medidas pelo profissional. Não houve associação entre avaliação de higiene pelo paciente e pelo profissional. CONCLUSÕES: Após cinco anos, a reabilitação oral com PPR estava satisfatória na maioria dos casos. Houve correspondência entre as variáveis retenção/retenção e mastigação-conforto/estabilidade. Higiene oral e da prótese não mostraram associação.

Most removable partial denture (RPD) wearers are satisfied with their prostheses, but the factors that influence satisfaction and acceptance are still not determined. OBJECTIVE: This study explored technical, biological, and satisfaction variables for the functioning of RPDs after five years, and compared the evaluation by the patient and by the clinician. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty adults (39 females, 11 males) were re-examined after five years of RPD service. Data were collected through clinical examination and a structured questionnaire to record the conditions of supporting soft tissues, prosthesis acceptance and technical characteristics, mastication, esthetics, comfort, hygiene, and need for professional intervention. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics and Spearman correlation. RESULTS: More than 50% of patients classified their RPDs as excellent regarding retention, mastication, esthetics, comfort, and hygiene. In the professional evaluation, retention and stability were considered excellent in more than 66% of cases, and hygiene of teeth and prostheses was considered good in 52% and 46%, respectively. The metallic framework and acrylic base were considered adapted in 92% of cases. Prosthesis acceptance was associated with retention, mastication, esthetics, hygiene, and comfort evaluated by the patient, and with retention, stability, and condition of the framework evaluated by the clinician. Retention and mastication/comfort evaluated by the patient had moderate positive correlation with retention and stability measured by the clinician. There was no association of hygiene evaluation by the patient and by the clinician. CONCLUSIONS: After five years, the oral rehabilitation with RPDs was satisfactory for most cases. There was correspondence between retention/retention and mastication-comfort/stability variables evaluated by the patient and by the clinician. Oral and prosthesis hygiene were not related.